Chris R (for Reading) rated Fourth Wing: 3 stars

Fourth Wing by Rebecca Yarros
Twenty-year-old Violet Sorrengail was supposed to enter the Scribe Quadrant, living a quiet life among books and history. Now, the …
This link opens in a pop-up window
Twenty-year-old Violet Sorrengail was supposed to enter the Scribe Quadrant, living a quiet life among books and history. Now, the …
I found myself both hooked on this book and entirely disappointed in it; it basically listed every trope of the YA dark romance and hit them all, one after the other.
It's like an extremely horny Harry Potter.
Beck Garrison lives on a seastead — an archipelago of constructed platforms and old cruise …
I blew through this start to finish on a flight from LA to Portland; it's a fast and easy read.
It was kind of a Bioshock on the surface, and I enjoyed it.
It’s thirty years from now. We’re making progress, mitigating climate change, slowly but surely. But …
I finished this book on the plane yesterday, on my way, ironically, to Burbank (or close enough to it).
First up, I enjoyed it, overall. The story was tightly told, the stakes were more or less clear, and the near-future setting had enough connections to the present to feel very plausible.
I had a bit of a hard time with the viewpoint character, who kept giving off vibes of "clueless post-millennial kid" in how they approached problems; I think the scene that gelled it for me was when something viscerally upsetting happened, and their response was along the lines of "I knew what I had to do; I had to go and bear witness". That sentiment pervades the whole book, this sense of "dunking on people on social media will change the world" and I think I have a hard time believing that, given the way the world has …
I finished this book on the plane yesterday, on my way, ironically, to Burbank (or close enough to it).
First up, I enjoyed it, overall. The story was tightly told, the stakes were more or less clear, and the near-future setting had enough connections to the present to feel very plausible.
I had a bit of a hard time with the viewpoint character, who kept giving off vibes of "clueless post-millennial kid" in how they approached problems; I think the scene that gelled it for me was when something viscerally upsetting happened, and their response was along the lines of "I knew what I had to do; I had to go and bear witness". That sentiment pervades the whole book, this sense of "dunking on people on social media will change the world" and I think I have a hard time believing that, given the way the world has moved in the past decade. If this book had been released in the year of the Arab Spring, maybe I would have been more convinced, but it's a hard sell a decade later when it's clear that the Arab Spring didn't generate meaningful long term change, other than to teach governments that clamping down on dissent over social media is important, and ensuring they have the tools to do it.
It's a very optimistic book, despite its setting, and I'm not sure I feel the same optimism.
This was a good read, even if the ending got a bit ... "less".
I found the first two thirds to be the stronger part of the book. The way the world was talked around, papered over, and suppressed made for some powerful and occasionally hilarious moments.
The back third, cathartic as some of it was, didn't excite me as much. I wonder how much of that is because of who I am and because the book wasn't really written with me as the audience, and how much of it might be due to the book.
In any case, I still recommend this book unreservedly; it's a fantastic read.
This was a fantastic bit of writing; a novella that I devoured a little bit TOO fast. It's all first-person, the narrator is probably reliable, and I have SO MANY QUESTIONS about the worldbuilding.
I really appreciated the author's postscript about having a lot less scientific rigor in it given the concept. There's also a neat easter egg if you read it in colour.
I enjoyed this book way more than I expected to based on the premise. A bartender asked me what the book was about, and the best description I could come up with was "Imagine gamers that are trying to, and succeeding at, saving the world, in a corpo-fascist shithole future" and that never changed.
It's interesting to have a viewpoint first person character that is not particularly likeable and yet still manages to be a real protagonist; the last time I ran into this was in the Hunger Games series, and this book has a bit of a YA-bent to it too, albeit with several tropes absent.
I enjoyed it; I found myself wanting more, although I think the next book would be a lot harder to write well.
In the end this book was unsatisfying, despite the individual parts being enjoyable. The ending felt rushed and in some senses unearned. I wanted more agency from the protagonist... up until he got agency and then it was hard to understand the suddenness of the change.
The ending was a bit rushed, and had a bit too much of the "gunfight at the OK corral" feel to it, but I enjoyed the book, and the worldbuilding was excellent.
Finding out that there was a sequel to Wanderers got me really curious; it's an interesting post-apocalypse.
There's no question it's a novel of the period in which it was written; white nationalism, populist insurrections, and anti-maskers figure prominently.
So far I'm about 10% into this one, and my main criticism is that I JUST WANT THE CHARACTERS TO FUCKING TALK TO EACH OTHER.
I read this (via Audible) on the drive to Portland yesterday. It's a brief nibble of a story, and does a great job of setting up its premise, hinting at the structure of what is to come, and then ending on a lovely grace note. I really enjoyed it, and I don't really want more; I think it was the perfect amount of that story.