One of the most frustratingly insider views inside occupy that I've had the misfortune to read. The problems with occupy get shoved under the hood, and the demands for "activism" mean nothing by themselves... But instead of an examinations or an explanation, there's a list of talks and "prominent figures." Occupy itself barely gets a lock in before it is tied into the writer's philosophy.

The wired article by Quinn Norton is much better. Read that instead.